Professors: Jon McGee and Richard L. Warms
Class Meets: T-Th 9:30 - 10:50
Office: ELA 232
Office Hours: Warms: 8:15-9:15 daily and as available. McGee: T-TH
3:30-5:00
Tel: 245-8272 (main office)
E-mail: McGee: RM08@txstate.edu, Warms: r.warms@txstate.edu
Welcome to Texas State University - San Marcos' graduate seminar in
cultural anthropology. We're really pleased to have you all here and
we're looking forward to an exciting and challenging semester.
The seminar in cultural anthropology is designed to give you an
overview of the history of anthropological theory from the Victorian
era to the current day. To that end we will be reading and
discussing both original material and analyses of that material by
modern commentators. Dr. Warms has prepared a website associated
with the course that includes a variety of supplementary materials
at www.marxandspencer.net. Dr. McGee has a TRACS site where you can
find copies of course documents and readings.
Required Readings:
McGee/Warms Anthropological Theory: an Introductory History.
4th edition.
In addition, essays not in the text are on the class TRACS site and
available through ERES.
Class Requirements:
Class requirements include three papers, and six “close read” projects.
Please note that all written work for this class must be submitted
as email attachments in MS Word. We will be using Word's "track
changes" feature so other word processors are not acceptable. MS
Office is available at the bookstore at an extremely low price. Work is due by midnight on the dates listed. You will note that
these are not necessarily days when the class meets. All papers
involve a peer review process (described below). Please note that
timing is extremely important. Abstracts or papers more than 24
hours late will not be accepted (and, as a result you will have to
drop the course).
Papers: Each student will prepare three papers on topics of
their choosing relevant to the history under discussion in each
period of the class. Papers should be no less than five pages long
and may not be more than seven pages long (excluding title page,
references, and endnotes). Students must hand in a paper title and
an abstract of approximately 100 words before each paper is due.
Your first paper is worth 25% of your class grade. Your second paper
is worth 35% and your third paper is worth 40% of your grade.
IMPORTANT. You will note that your papers count for 100% of
your class grade. However, please be aware that instructors
may also add points to or subtract points from your final course
grade based on class attendance, class participation, and close read
assignments as described below.
No outside reading is required for papers, however it is respected.
Papers must be
referenced and should show understanding of key concepts in
anthropological theory and mastery of readings assigned for class.
Papers will be graded for both content and style. Papers must
conform to AAA style. Style sheets are available on the web. You can
get them by following the link on the class introduction page or by
clicking here
This semester, all papers will use a peer review process. The basis
of peer reviewing is that students are paired. They read and comment
on each other's work before it is submitted to their professor. In
this case you'll be paired a different student for each paper.
Please note that when you review papers, you should be polite but
deeply critical. We will grade papers with in great detail and
critique them sentence by sentence. You are no help to your
partner if you do not do the same.
For the first paper:
You will submit your abstract to your professor by midnight,
September 16.
Your professor will return it to you by midnight on September 20.
You will then have about five days to write your paper.
You will submit your paper to your professor and your peer reviewer
by midnight, September 25.
Your reviewer will mark-up your paper using the track changes
feature in MS Word. The reviewer is responsible for checking for
grammatical mistakes, mistakes in logic, or flow. The reviewer
should also provide comments indicating the strength and weakness of
the paper as well as suggestions for improvement.
Your reviewer will return your paper to you and to your professor by
midnight on September 27.
You will revise your paper considering your reviewers comments and
submit it to your professor by midnight on October 2.
For the second paper
You will submit your abstract to your professor by midnight,
October21.
Your professor will return it to you by midnight on October 25.
You will then have about five days to write your paper.
You will submit your paper to your professor and your peer reviewer
by midnight, October 30.
Your reviewer will return your paper to you and to your professor by
midnight on November 1.
You will revise your paper considering your reviewers comments and
submit it to your professor by midnight on November 6.
For your third paper
Submit your abstract to your professor by midnight on November 24.
Your professor will return it to you by midnight on November 30.
Submit your paper to your professor and your reviewer by midnight on
December 5.
Reviewers must return papers by midnight December 8.
You will submit the final paper to your professor by midnight December
11.
No late papers will be accepted for any reason!
Close Read Project: In addition to the papers, you will be
required to do six "close read" projects and
presentation.
A close read is an attempt to understand an essay in minute detail.
You will be assigned six essays to read closely. For each
essay, follow these steps: Make a paper copy of the essay you've
been assigned. Number the paragraphs. Read each paragraph, and then
write a brief summary of the paragraph. Your summary should tell the
reader what the main point of the paragraph is. It should be much
shorter than the paragraph it summarizes. Keep in mind that you're
not trying to comment on the paragraph or give your opinion of it.
You are simply trying, in your own words, to reproduce exactly what
the author meant. Your final product should be a numbered list of
your paragraph summaries. I have prepared an example for you and you
can find it by following the link on the class opening page. You
must submit your close reads to your instructor on the day each
essay is scheduled to be discussed. We anticipate that your
close read projects will be thoughtful, well executed, and turned in
on time. Please be aware that your instructors may subtract up
to five points from your final course grade for close read projects
that are late or are inadequate. In rare cases of truly
exceptional work, instructors may also add up to three points to
your final course grade.
Attendance: This is grad school folks. We expect you to be
here for every class meeting.
If, for some reason, you cannot make a class meeting, please inform
your instructor ahead of time by email. Instructors may, at
their discretion excuse absences. However, please not that
instructors are not required to excuse absences regardless of
reason. We anticipate that almost all students will have
perfect or nearly perfect attendance. This will, of itself,
have no affect on their grade. However, please be aware that
instructors may, at their discretion subtract up to five points from
your final class grade for poor attendance.
Participation: Seminar style classes are based
around discussion and debate. In order for them to work students
must come prepared to discuss the material they have read. Please
arrive to classes having read the assigned material and prepared to
discuss it. You will be quizzed on the readings in class. You
will be expected to explain them or at least recount what they say. Very important: Please understand that you should treat
this and all other seminar classes as a sort of game. The ultimate
goal of the game is deep knowledge of the subject matter, but the
proximal goal is to maintain intense critical discussion. It’s kind
of like trying to keep a balloon or ball in the air by bouncing it
from person to person. It’s successful and fun when we can keep the
ball in the air for a reasonably long time. It’s very important for
you to talk in this class. However, it is also very important for
you to understand that your professors will rarely applaud your
contribution. Instead, they will challenge you to back up your point
or consider other factors, or implications. It’s very important for
you to challenge other students and respond to their points. The
tone of discussion should be professional (click here for an example
of what not to do). However, give and take is par for the course. On
the one hand, no professor will ever consciously try to humiliate
you. On the other, being a little bit tough is a requirement for
success in anthropology.
We anticipate that students will contribute regularly to class
discussion in a manner that demonstrates their understanding of
assigned readings. Average class participation will have no
affect on grades. However, please be aware that instructors
may, at their discretion, add or subtract up to five points from
your final class grade for exceptionally good or exceptionally poor
participation.
Students with special needs: Students with special needs (as
documented by the Office of Disability Services) should identify
themselves at the beginning of the term. The Department of
Anthropology is dedicated to providing these students with necessary
academic adjustments and auxiliary aids to facilitate their
participation and performance in the classroom.
All syllabi are subject to change...and this one is more subject to
change than most.
Summary of Important Dates:
First Day of Class: August 27
Paper 1:
Abstract due to professor: Sept 16
Professor returns abstract: Sept 20
Paper to reviewer and professor: Sept 25
Reviewers return paper: Sept 27
First paper due: Oct 2
Paper 2
Abstract for second paper due: Oct 21
Abstract returned: Oct 25
Paper to reviewer and professor: Oct 30
Reviewers return paper: Nov 1
Second paper due: Nov 6
Paper 3
Abstract for third paper due: Nov 24
Professor returns abstract: Nov 30
Paper to reviewer and professor: Dec 5
Reviewers return paper: Dec 8
Final paper due: Dec 11
Readings and Lecture Topics
|
Class 1, Aug 27 |
Introductions, syllabus, background |
|
Class 2, Sept. 1
|
Early anthropology and Darwin
Read: Prichard: "On the Causes which have Produced the
diversities of the Human Species" and sections one and two
of "Of the Physical History of the most remarkable races of
men"
Read: Darwin: On the Origin of Species, Ch. 14:
Recapitulation and conclusion |
|
Class 3, Sept. 3 |
Nineteenth Century Evolutionists
Read: Spencer essay in Anthropological Theory
Read: Morgan Essay from Anthropological Theory |
|
Class 4, Sept 8 |
E. B. Tylor and Victorian Anthropology
Read: Tylor Essay from Anthropological Theory
Read: Tylor, "On a Method of Investigating the
Development of Institutions" |
|
Class 5, Sept 10
|
Early Marx
Read: Marx Essay from Anthropological Theory
Read: Marx, Communist Manifesto |
|
Class 6, Sept 15
|
Later Marx
Read:
Engels: Excerpt from Origin of Family, Private Property and
the State
Read:: Childe, “Neolithic Revolution” |
|
Class 7, Sept 17
|
Emile Durkheim and L'Anne Sociologique
Read: Durkheim “What is a Social Fact” from Anthropological
Theory
Read: Mauss: Selection from The Gift from Anthropological
theory |
|
Class 8, Sept 22 |
Durkheim, Evolution and Classification
Read: Durkheim, “The Division of Labor in Society”
Read: Hertz: "The Pre-eminence of the Right Hand" |
|
Class 9, Sept 24 |
19th Century American Anthropology
Read: Hinsley, "Ethnographic Charisma and Scientific
Routine: Cushing and Fewkes in the American Southwest
1879-1893" (from Stocking Observers Observed).
Read: Cushing, "My Adventures in Zuni." |
|
Class 10, Sept 29
|
Franz Boas and the development of American Anthropology
Read: Boas, Limitations of the Comparative Method in
Anthropology (1896)
"Museums of Ethnology and Their Classification" Science
9(228) 587-589 1887, Powell, J.W. "Museums of Ethnology and
their Classification (with a response by Franz Boas) Science
9 (612-614)
Read: Kroeber Essay from Anthropological Theory |
|
Class 11, Oct 1
|
Boasians in the early 20th Century
Read:
Radin essay from Anthropological Theory
Read:
Mead essay from Anthropological Theory
Read: : Benedict essay from Anthropological Theory |
|
Class 12, Oct 6
|
British Functionalism
Read: Malinowski essay from Anthropological Theory
Read: Radcliffe-Brown essay from Anthropological Theory |
|
Class 13, Oct 8
|
Functionalism in Practice
Read: Evans-Pritchard: “The Nuer of the Southern Sudan”
Read: Max Gluckman essay from Anthropological
Theory |
|
Class 14, Oct 13
|
The reaction to Boas
Read: Steward essay from Anthropological Theory
Read: Steward: "The Concept and Method of Cultural Ecology" |
|
Class 15, Oct 15 |
The Reaction to Boas (cont.)
Read:
White essay from Anthropological Theory
Read: White: "Man's Control Over Civilization" |
|
Class 16, Oct 20
|
Modernist Anthropology at Mid-Century: Materialist
Approaches
Read: Fried essay in Anthropological Theory
Read: Harris essay in Anthropological Theory
Read: Wolf: "Santa Clause: Notes on a Collective
Representation" |
|
Class 17, Oct 22
|
Cultural Ecology
Read: Rappaport essay in Anthropological Theory
Read: Lansing: "Balinese 'Water Temples' and the Management
of Irrigation." |
|
Class 18, Oct 27 |
Modernist Anthropology at Mid-Century: Mentalist Approaches
Read: Conklin essay in Anthropological Theory
Read: Tyler essay in Anthropological Theory
Read: Wierzbicka:
"Japanese Cultural Scripts" |
|
Class 19, Oct 29 |
Levi-Strauss and Structuralism
Read:
Levi Strauss essays in Anthropological Theory
Read: Ortner essay in Anthropological Theory |
|
Class 20, Nov. 3 |
World History, Dependency, Neo-Marxism I
Read: Gunder-Frank: "The Development of Underdevelopment"
Read: Wolf: "The movement of commodities" (Europe and the
People w/o History) |
|
Class 21, Nov 5 |
World History, Dependency, Neo-Marxism II
Read: Leacock essay from Anthropological Theory
Read: Althusser: "Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses
(Notes towards an Investigation)" |
|
Class 22, Nov 10 |
Anthropology and Gender, the Feminist Critique
Read: Slocum essay from Anthropological Theory
Read: Stoler essay from Anthropological Theory
Read: di Leonardo: Gender, Culture and Political
Economy (Gender at the Crossroads of Knowledge) |
|
Class 23, Nov 12 |
Symbolic Anthropology
Read: Douglas essay in Anthropological Theory
Read: Turner essay in Anthropological Theory
Read: Ortner: "On Key Symbols" |
|
Class 24, Nov 17 |
Interpretive Anthropology
Read: Geertz essay in Anthropological Theory
Read: Geertz: "Thick Description" |
|
Class 25, Nov 19 |
Background to Post Modernism
Read: Baudrillard: "The Beaubourg-Effect: Implosion and
Deterrence"
Read: Foucault: "History of Systems of Thought" |
|
Class 26, Nov 24 |
Post Modernism in Anthropology
Read: Rosaldo essay from Anthropological Theory
Read: Abu-Lughod essay from Anthropological Theory |
|
Class 27, Dec. 1 |
Post Modernism continued and Reaction to Postmodernism
Read: Tyler “Postmodern Ethnography: from Document
of the Occult to Occult Document”Read: D'Andrade essay in Anthropological Theory
Read: Scheper-Hughes: "The Primacy of the
Ethical: Propositions for a militant anthropology"
|
|
Class 28, Dec 3 |
Modernity and Globalization in Anthropological Perspective
Read: Appadurai essay in Anthropological Theory
Read: Nash: "Consuming Interests" |
|