Professor: Richard L. Warms
Class Meets: T-Th 9:30 - 10:50
Office: ELA 260
Office Hours: Warms: 8:15-9:15 daily and as available.
Tel: 245-8272 (main office)
E-mail: r.warms@txstate.edu
Welcome to Texas State University - San Marcos' graduate seminar in
cultural anthropology. We're really pleased to have you all here and
we're looking forward to an exciting and challenging semester.
The seminar in cultural anthropology is designed to give you an
overview of the history of anthropological theory from the Victorian
era to the current day. To that end we will be reading and
discussing both original material and analyses of that material by
modern commentators. You will find course documents and supplementary readings for the course on the TRACS site and a variety of other supplementary information on the course website at www.marxandspencer.net
Required Readings:
McGee/Warms Anthropological Theory: an Introductory History.
5th edition.
In addition, essays not in the text are on the class TRACS site.
Class Requirements:
Class requirements include two papers, and five “close read” projects, one reading report and a multiple choice final exam.
Please note that all written work for this class must be submitted
as email attachments in MS Word. We will be using Word's "track
changes" feature so other word processors are not acceptable. MS
Office is available at the bookstore at an extremely low price. Work is due by 23:59 on the dates listed. You will note that
these are not necessarily days when the class meets. All papers
involve a peer review process (described below). Please note that
timing is extremely important. Abstracts or papers more than 24
hours late will not be accepted (and, as a result you will have to
drop the course).
Papers: Each student will prepare two papers on topics of
their choosing relevant to the history under discussion in each
period of the class. Papers should be no less than 1500 words
and may not be more than 2,250 words (excluding title page,
references, and endnotes). Students must hand in a paper title and
an abstract of approximately 100 words before each paper is due.
Your first paper is worth 35% of your class grade. Your second paper
is worth 45% of your class grade.
Exam: There will be a multiple choice final exam testing your general knowledge of history and theory in cultural anthropology. It will count for 15% of your final grade.
Attendance: This is grad school folks. We expect you to be
here for every class meeting. If, for some reason, you cannot make a class meeting, please inform
me ahead of time by email. I may, at my discretion excuse absences. However, please note that
instructors are not required to excuse absences regardless of
reason. I anticipate that almost all students will have
perfect or nearly perfect attendance. Attendance will count for 5% of your grade as follows:
Perfect attendance: 100
One missed class: 95
Two missed classes: 80
Three missed classes: 60
Four missed classes: 40
More than four missed classes: 0
IMPORTANT. You will note that your papers, exam, and attendance count for 100% of
your class grade. However, please be aware that I may also add points to or subtract points from your final course
grade based class participation, and close read
assignments as described below.
No outside reading is required for papers, however it is respected.
Papers must be
referenced and should show understanding of key concepts in
anthropological theory and mastery of readings assigned for class.
Papers will be graded for both content and style. Papers must
conform to AAA style. Style sheets are available on the web. You can
get them by following the link on the class introduction page or by
clicking here.
Papers will use a peer review process. The basis
of peer reviewing is that students are paired. They read and comment
on each other's work before it is submitted to their professor. In
this case you'll be paired a different student for each paper.
Please note that when you review papers, you should be polite but
deeply critical. I will grade papers in great detail and
critique them sentence by sentence. You are no help to your
partner if you do not do the same.
For the first paper:
You will submit your abstract to your professor by 23:59,
September 23.
Your professor will return it to you by 23:59 on September 26.
You will then have about ten days to write your paper.
You will submit your paper to your professor and your peer reviewer
by 23:59, Oct 5.
Your reviewer will mark-up your paper using the track changes
feature in MS Word. The reviewer is responsible for checking for
grammatical mistakes, mistakes in logic, or flow. The reviewer
should also provide comments indicating the strength and weakness of
the paper as well as suggestions for improvement.
Your reviewer will return your paper to you and to your professor by
23:59 on October 8.
You will revise your paper considering your reviewers comments and
submit it to your professor by 23:59 on October 12.
For the second paper
You will submit your abstract to your professor by 23:59,
October28.
Your professor will return it to you by 23:59 on October 31.
You will then have about ten days to write your paper.
You will submit your paper to your professor and your peer reviewer
by 23:59, Nov 9.
Your reviewer will return your paper to you and to your professor by
23:59 on November 12.
You will revise your paper considering your reviewers comments and
submit it to your professor by 23:59 on November 16.
No late papers will be accepted for any reason!
Close Read Project: In addition to the papers, you will be
required to do five "close read" projects and
presentation.
A close read is an attempt to understand an essay in minute detail.
You will be assigned five essays to read closely. For each
essay, follow these steps: Make a paper copy of the essay you've
been assigned. Number the paragraphs. Read each paragraph, and then
write a brief summary of the paragraph. Your summary should tell the
reader what the main point of the paragraph is. It should be much
shorter than the paragraph it summarizes. Keep in mind that you're
not trying to comment on the paragraph or give your opinion of it.
You are simply trying, in your own words, to reproduce exactly what
the author meant. Your final product should be a numbered list of
your paragraph summaries. I have prepared an example for you and you
can find it by following the link on the class opening page. You
must submit your close reads to your instructor on the day each
essay is scheduled to be discussed. We anticipate that your
close read projects will be thoughtful, well executed, and turned in
on time. Please be aware that your instructors may subtract up
to five points from your final course grade for close read projects
that are late or are inadequate. In rare cases of truly
exceptional work, instructors may also add up to three points to
your final course grade.
Critical Reading Report: You are assigned two essays:
Hinsley, "Ethnographic Charisma and Scientific
Routine: Cushing and Fewkes in the American Southwest
1879-1893" (from Stocking Observers Observed) and Cushing, "My Adventures in Zuni."
The first of these is a modern analytic piece, the second, a 19th century first person account. Your assignment is to write a 1250 word paper in which you provide a very brief summary of each article (about 250 words each) and then an additional 500 words of analysis for each essay in which you discuss the strengths and weakness of each. Grading for this report will be up to three points added or subtracted from your final course grade. It will be helpful to you to read several book reviews from American Anthropologist before doing this project. This project is due at 11:59 on September 18.
Participation: Seminar style classes are based
around discussion and debate. In order for them to work students
must come prepared to discuss the material they have read. Please
arrive to classes having read the assigned material and prepared to
discuss it. You will be quizzed on the readings in class. You
will be expected to explain them or at least recount what they say. Very important: Please understand that you should treat
this and all other seminar classes as a sort of game. The ultimate
goal of the game is deep knowledge of the subject matter, but the
proximal goal is to maintain intense critical discussion. It’s kind
of like trying to keep a balloon or ball in the air by bouncing it
from person to person. It’s successful and fun when we can keep the
ball in the air for a reasonably long time. It’s very important for
you to talk in this class. However, it is also very important for
you to understand that your professors will rarely applaud your
contribution. Instead, they will challenge you to back up your point
or consider other factors, or implications. It’s very important for
you to challenge other students and respond to their points. The
tone of discussion should be professional (click here for an example
of what not to do). However, give and take is par for the course. On
the one hand, no professor will ever consciously try to humiliate
you. On the other, being a little bit tough is a requirement for
success in anthropology.
We anticipate that students will contribute regularly to class
discussion in a manner that demonstrates their understanding of
assigned readings. Average class participation will have no
affect on grades. However, please be aware that instructors
may, at their discretion, add or subtract up to five points from
your final class grade for exceptionally good or exceptionally poor
participation.
Official Stuff
Students with special needs (as
documented by the Office of Disability Services) should identify
themselves at the beginning of the term. The Department of
Anthropology is dedicated to providing these students with necessary
academic adjustments and auxiliary aids to facilitate their
participation and performance in the classroom.
The page found at the following link constitutes a supplement to this syllabus. Please visit the page to familiarize yourself with the Anthropology Department’s program learning outcomes (http://www.txstate.edu/anthropology/about/missionstmt-outcomes.html).
All syllabi are subject to change...and this one is more subject to
change than most.
Summary of Important Dates:
First Day of Class: August 25
Critical Reading Report, Sept 18
Paper 1:
Abstract due to professor: Sept 23
Professor returns abstract: Sept 26
Paper to reviewer and professor: Oct 5
Reviewers return paper: Oct 8
First paper due: Oct 12
Paper 2:
Abstract for second paper due: Oct 28
Abstract returned: Oct 31
Paper to reviewer and professor: Nov 9
Reviewers return paper: Nov 12
Second paper due: Nov 16
Final Exam: Tuesday Dec. 13, 8-10:30
Readings and Lecture Topics
| Week 0 |
Class 1, Aug 25
|
Introductions, syllabus, background |
|
Week 1 |
Class 2, Aug 30
|
Nineteenth Century Evolutionists
Read: Spencer essay in Anthropological Theory
Read: Morgan Essay from Anthropological Theory |
|
Class 3, Sept. 2
|
E. B. Tylor and Victorian Anthropology
Read: Tylor Essay from Anthropological Theory
Read: Rivers: The genealogical method of anthropological
inquiry (Sociol. Review, III, pp. 1-12)
|
| Week 2 |
Class 4, Sept 6
|
Early Marx
Read: Marx Essay from Anthropological Theory
Read: Marx, Theses on Feuerbach
|
|
Class 5, Sept 8
|
Later Marx
Read:
Engels: Excerpt from Origin of Family, Private Property and
the State
Read:: Childe, “Neolithic Revolution”
|
| Week 3 |
Class 6, Sept 13
|
Emile Durkheim and L'Anne Sociologique
Read: Durkheim “What is a Social Fact” from Anthropological
Theory
Read: Mauss: Selection from The Gift from Anthropological
theory |
|
Class 7, Sept 15
|
Durkheim, Evolution and Classification
Read: Durkheim and Mauss, Primitive Classification chapter 1, "The Problem" and "The Australian Type of Classification."
Read: Hertz: "The Pre-eminence of the Right Hand"
|
| Reading and Writing Assignment Only |
|
19th Century American Anthropology
Read: Hinsley, "Ethnographic Charisma and Scientific
Routine: Cushing and Fewkes in the American Southwest
1879-1893" (from Stocking Observers Observed).
Read: Cushing, "My Adventures in Zuni."
|
| Week 4 |
Class 8, Sept 20
|
Franz Boas and the development of American Anthropology
Read: Boas, Limitations of the Comparative Method in
Anthropology (1896)
"Museums of Ethnology and Their Classification" Science
9(228) 587-589 1887, Powell, J.W. "Museums of Ethnology and
their Classification (with a response by Franz Boas) Science
9 (612-614)
Read: Kroeber Essay from Anthropological Theory
|
|
Class 9, Sept 22
|
Boasians in the early 20th Century
Read:
Radin essay from Anthropological Theory
Read:
Mead essay from Anthropological Theory
Read: : Benedict essay from Anthropological Theory |
| Week 5 |
Class 10, Sept 27
|
British Functionalism
Read: Malinowski essay from Anthropological Theory
Read: Radcliffe-Brown essay from Anthropological Theory |
|
Class 11, Sept 29
|
Functionalism in Practice
Read: Evans-Pritchard: “The Nuer of the Southern Sudan”
Read: Max Gluckman essay from Anthropological
Theory |
| Week 6 |
Class 12, Oct 4
|
The reaction to Boas
Read: Steward essay from Anthropological Theory
Read: Steward: "The Concept and Method of Cultural Ecology" |
|
Class 13, Oct 6
|
The Reaction to Boas (cont.)
Read:
White essay from Anthropological Theory
Read: White: "Man's Control Over Civilization" |
| Week 7 |
Class 14, Oct 11
|
Modernist Anthropology at Mid-Century: Materialist
Approaches
Read: Fried essay in Anthropological Theory
Read: Harris essay in Anthropological Theory
Read: Wolf: "Santa Clause: Notes on a Collective
Representation" |
|
Class 15, Oct 13
|
Modernist Approaches at Mid-Century: Cultural Ecology
Read: Rappaport essay in Anthropological Theory
Read: Lansing: "Balinese 'Water Temples' and the Management
of Irrigation." |
| Week 8 |
Class 16, Oct 18
|
Modernist Approaches at Mid-Century: Levi-Strauss and Structuralism
Read:
Levi Strauss essays in Anthropological Theory
Read: Ortner essay in Anthropological Theory
|
|
Class 17, Oct 20
|
Modernist Anthropology at Mid-Century: Ethnoscience
Read: Conklin essay in Anthropological Theory
Read: Tyler essay in Anthropological Theory
Read:
Wierzbicka
:
"Japanese Cultural Scripts"
|
| Week 9 |
Class 18, Oct 25
|
Mid-Century Marxist Approaches: Europe and South America
Read: Althusser: "Ideology and Ideological State Apparatuses
(Notes towards an Investigation)"Read: Gunder-Frank: "The Development of Underdevelopment"
|
|
Class 19, Oct 27
|
Mid Century Marxist Approaches: the US
Read: Leacock essay from Anthropological Theory
Read: Wolf: essay in Anthropological Theory
Read Bourgeois essay in Anthropological Theory
|
| Week 10 |
Class 20, Nov. 1
|
Symbolic Anthropology
Read: Douglas essay in Anthropological Theory
Read: Turner essay in Anthropological Theory
Read: Ortner: "On Key Symbols" |
|
Class 21, Nov 3
|
Background to Post Modernism
Read: Bourdieu: Structures, Habitus, Practices
Read: Foucault: The Incitement to Discourse |
| Week 11 |
Class 22, Nov 8
|
Clifford Geertz and Interpretive Anthropology
Read: Geertz essay in Anthropological Theory
|
|
Class 23, Nov 10
|
Clifford Geertz continued
Read: Geertz: "Thick Description"
|
| Week 12 |
Class 24, Nov 15
|
Post Modernism in Anthropology
Read: Rosaldo essay from Anthropological Theory
Read: Hanson "The Making of the Maori"
in Anthropological Theory
|
|
Class 25, Nov 17
|
Post Modernism continued and Reaction to Postmodernism
Document”
Read: D'Andrade "Moral Models in Anthropology"
Read: Scheper-Hughes: "The Primacy of the
Ethical: Propositions for a militant anthropology"
|
Week 13
(Thanksgiving break: one class only) |
Class 26, Nov 22
|
Anthropology and Gender, the Feminist Critique
Read: Slocum essay from Anthropological Theory
Read: Valentine "I went to bed with my own kind once"
in Anthropological Theory
|
| Week 14 |
Class 27, Dec 29
|
Modernity and Globalization in Anthropological Perspective
Read: Appadurai essay in Anthropological Theory
Read: Bestor "Kaiten-zushi and Konbini"
in Anthropological Theory
|
|
Class 28, Dec 1
|
|
|